Hot Or Not?
I "borrowed" this idea from my morning talk show because I found it both appalling and interesting (in an "intellectually honest" kind of way).
Take two instances of female teacher/male student rape.
Case #1: Debbie LaFave - charged with having sex with a 14 year old student.
Case #2: Rachel Holt - charged with having sex with a 13 year old student.
In the opinion of the morning talk show host, the first woman isn't really guilty of any crime. In the second case, he thinks the woman is a disgusting predator.
What is the difference between these two cases?
A sad, sad truth of life.
Take two instances of female teacher/male student rape.
Case #1: Debbie LaFave - charged with having sex with a 14 year old student.
Case #2: Rachel Holt - charged with having sex with a 13 year old student.
In the opinion of the morning talk show host, the first woman isn't really guilty of any crime. In the second case, he thinks the woman is a disgusting predator.
What is the difference between these two cases?
| Case #1 |
Case #2
|
posted by B at 9:12 AM
5 comments
